↓ Skip to main content

英文論文のススメ

Overview of attention for article published in Akamon Management Review, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 171)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
英文論文のススメ
Published in
Akamon Management Review, January 2004
DOI 10.14955/amr.030102
Authors

高橋 伸夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,659,707
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Akamon Management Review
#32
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,275
of 144,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Akamon Management Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them