↓ Skip to main content

Complementary therapies for clinical depression: an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complementary therapies for clinical depression: an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 424 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Master 38 9%
Researcher 26 6%
Other 20 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 54 13%
Unknown 220 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 10%
Psychology 23 5%
Neuroscience 14 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 229 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,449,185
of 33,244,777 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,365
of 29,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,696
of 379,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#70
of 912 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,244,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 912 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.