↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Influence of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration in Clinical Outcomes of Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia Treated With Daptomycin: Is it Time to Change the Breakpoint?
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2016
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw173
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 Daptomycin has become a key front-line antibiotic for multidrug-resistantE. faeciumbloodstream infections (BSIs). We previously showed thatE. faeciumstrains with daptomycin MICs in the higher end of susceptibility frequently harbor mutations in genes associated with daptomycin resistance. We postulate that patients withE. faeciumBSIs exhibiting daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL and treated with daptomycin are more likely to have worse clinical outcomes than those exhibiting daptomycin MICs≤2 µg/mL.  We conducted a multicenter (4 sites) retrospective cohort study (2010 - 2015) that included adult patients withE. faeciumBSI for whom initial isolates, follow-up blood culture data, and daptomycin administration data were available. A central laboratory performed standardized daptomycin MIC testing for all isolates. The primary outcome was microbiologic failure, defined as clearance of bacteremia occurring ≥4 days after the index blood culture. The secondary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.  A total of 62 patients were included. Thirty-one patients (50%) were infected with isolates exhibiting daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL. Overall, 34 (55%) patients had microbiologic failure and 25 (40%) died during hospitalization. On a multivariate logistic regression model, daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL (OR 4.7 [1.37-16.12], p=0.014) and immunosuppression (OR 5.32 [1.20-23.54], p=0.028) were significantly associated with microbiologic failure, while initial daptomycin dose of ≥8 mg/kg was not significantly associated with evaluated outcomes.  Daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL in the initialE. faeciumblood isolate predicted microbiological failure of DAP therapy suggesting that modification in the daptomycin breakpoint for enterococci should be considered.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 19%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,159,147
of 26,447,081 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3,698
of 17,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,554
of 316,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#54
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,447,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.