↓ Skip to main content

Self‐injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,646)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self‐injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01537.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been identified as a risk marker for self-injurious behaviour. In this study we aimed to describe the prevalence, topography and correlates of self-injury in individuals with ASD in contrast to individuals with Fragile X and Down syndromes and examine person characteristics associated with self-injury across and within these groups.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 246 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 21%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 12%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 14%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 64 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,663,631
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#43
of 1,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,737
of 200,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.