↓ Skip to main content

Understanding sciatica: illness and treatment beliefs in a lumbar radicular pain population. A qualitative interview study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 640)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
171 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Understanding sciatica: illness and treatment beliefs in a lumbar radicular pain population. A qualitative interview study
Published in
BJGP Open, August 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen19x101654
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Goldsmith, Nefyn Howard Williams, Fiona Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Sports and Recreations 9 9%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#379,907
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#10
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,646
of 357,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.