↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pretransplant CD4 Count Influences Immune Reconstitution and Risk of Infectious Complications in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Kidney Allograft Recipients
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, April 2016
DOI 10.1111/ajt.13782
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In current practice HIV(+) candidates with CD4 >200 cells/mm(3) are eligible for kidney transplantation. However, the optimal pre-transplant CD4 count above this threshold remains to be defined. We evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with baseline CD4 >350 and <350 cells/mm(3) among 38 anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-treated HIV(-) to HIV(+) kidney transplants performed at our center between 2006 and 2013. Median follow-up was 2.6 years. Rates of acute rejection, patient and graft survival were not different between groups. However, occurrence of severe CD4 lymphopenia (<200 cells/mm(3) ) was more common among individuals with a baseline CD4 count 200-349 cells/mm(3) compared to those transplanted at higher counts (75% vs 30% at 4 weeks [p=0.04] and 71% vs 5% at 52 weeks [p=0.001] post-transplant, respectively). After adjusting for age, baseline CD4 count of 200-349 cells/mm(3) was an independent predictor of severe CD4 lymphopenia at 4 (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.1) and 52 weeks (RR, 14.3; 95% CI, 2-100.4) post-transplant. Patients with CD4 <200 cells/mm(3) at 4 weeks had higher probability of serious infections during first 6 months post-transplant (19% vs. 50%; log-rank 0.05). These findings suggest that ATG must be used with caution in HIV(+) kidney allograft recipients with a pre-transplant CD4 count <350 cells/mm(3) . This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#3,463
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,563
of 314,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#83
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.