You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimating abundance in the presence of species uncertainty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12570 |
Authors |
Thierry Chambert, Blake R. Hossack, LeeAnn Fishback, Jon M. Davenport |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
United States | 4 | 11% |
Colombia | 2 | 5% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
Scientists | 15 | 39% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 23% |
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,393,886
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#588
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,246
of 313,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.