You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science communication activism: Protesting Traditional Chinese Medicine in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963662519865405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiaoyan Zhu, Maja Horst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#289,068
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#29
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,123
of 347,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.