↓ Skip to main content

N-Heterocyclic Phosphenium Ligands as Sterically and Electronically-Tunable Isolobal Analogues of Nitrosyls

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
N-Heterocyclic Phosphenium Ligands as Sterically and Electronically-Tunable Isolobal Analogues of Nitrosyls
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, March 2012
DOI 10.1021/ic202581v
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The coordination chemistry of an N-heterocyclic phosphenium (NHP)-containing bis(phosphine) pincer ligand has been explored with Pt(0) and Pd(0) precursors. Unlike previous compounds featuring monodentate NHP ligands, the resulting NHP Pt and Pd complexes feature pyramidal geometries about the central phosphorus atom, indicative of a stereochemically active lone pair. Structural, spectroscopic, and computational data suggest that the unusual pyramidal NHP geometry results from two-electron reduction of the phosphenium ligand to generate transition metal complexes in which the Pt or Pd centers have been formally oxidized by two electrons. Interconversion between planar and pyramidal NHP geometries can be affected by either coordination/dissociation of a two-electron donor ligand or two-electron redox processes, strongly supporting an isolobal analogy with the linear (NO(+)) and bent (NO(-)) variations of nitrosyl ligands. In contrast to nitrosyls, however, these new main group noninnocent ligands are sterically and electronically tunable and are amenable to incorporation into chelating ligands, perhaps representing a new strategy for promoting redox transformations at transition metal complexes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 59 79%
Engineering 1 1%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,143,536
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#11,610
of 21,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,589
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#45
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.