↓ Skip to main content

Safety, hemodynamic effects, and detection of acute xenon inhalation: rationale for banning xenon from sport

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Safety, hemodynamic effects, and detection of acute xenon inhalation: rationale for banning xenon from sport
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2019
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00290.2019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 19 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 21 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2025.
All research outputs
#2,939,415
of 33,945,077 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,503
of 11,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,049
of 381,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,945,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.