You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ferrule Effect: A Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Endodontics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jelena Juloski, Ivana Radovic, Cecilia Goracci, Zoran R. Vulicevic, Marco Ferrari |
| Abstract |
Preserving intact coronal and radicular tooth structure, especially maintaining cervical tissue to create a ferrule effect, is considered to be crucial for the optimal biomechanical behavior of restored teeth. The ferrule effect has been extensively studied and still remains controversial from many perspectives. The purpose of this study was to summarize the results of research conducted on different issues related to the ferrule effect and published in peer-reviewed journals listed in PubMed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 609 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 106 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 8% |
| Researcher | 34 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 120 | 19% |
| Unknown | 180 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 385 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 5 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 3% |
| Unknown | 192 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endodontics
#272
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,955
of 153,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endodontics
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.