↓ Skip to main content

How Will New Guidelines Affect CD4 Testing in Veterans With HIV?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Will New Guidelines Affect CD4 Testing in Veterans With HIV?
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2016
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw194
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 Guidelines now recommend limited use of routine CD4 testing in HIV positive patients with successful viral control who are not immuno-compromised.  CD4 and viral load tests for patients receiving HIV care from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) during 2009-2013 were evaluated to determine trends in CD4 testing frequency and the number, cost, and results of CD4 tests considered optional under the guidelines.  There were 28,530 individuals with sufficient testing to be included. At the time of their last CD4 test, 19.8% of the cohort was eligible for optional monitoring and 15.6% was eligible for minimal monitoring. CD4 testing frequency declined by 10.8% over four years, reducing the direct cost of testing by $US 196 thousand per year. Full implementation of new treatment guidelines could reduce CD4 testing a further 28.9%, an additional annual saving of $US 600 thousand. CD4 tests conducted during periods of potentially reduced monitoring were rarely<200 cells/mm(3); 1.1% of the tests conducted when minimal monitoring was recommended were less than this value and just 0.3% of tests conducted when optional monitoring was recommended.  Reduced CD4 monitoring of HIV positive patients would result in modest cost savings and likely reduce patient anxiety, with little or no impact on the quality of care. VA has made substantial progress in reducing the frequency of optional CD4 testing, but further reductions may still be warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Librarian 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,023,551
of 25,014,758 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#13,674
of 16,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,510
of 306,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#147
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,014,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.