| Title |
Systematic review of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex R Kemper, Heather A Van Mater, Remy R Coeytaux, John W Williams, Gillian D Sanders |
| Abstract |
Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may improve outcomes compared to conventional therapy (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular corticosteroids). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of DMARDs versus conventional therapy and versus other DMARDs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,658,783
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,400
of 3,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,071
of 159,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.