↓ Skip to main content

Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
citeulike
33 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures
Published in
Nature Protocols, March 2012
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2012.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Computational analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures are common tasks for gaining insight into biological processes. This protocol describes three workflows based on the NetworkAnalyzer and RINalyzer plug-ins for Cytoscape, a popular software platform for networks. NetworkAnalyzer has become a standard Cytoscape tool for comprehensive network topology analysis. In addition, RINalyzer provides methods for exploring residue interaction networks derived from protein structures. The first workflow uses NetworkAnalyzer to perform a topological analysis of biological networks. The second workflow applies RINalyzer to study protein structure and function and to compute network centrality measures. The third workflow combines NetworkAnalyzer and RINalyzer to compare residue networks. The full protocol can be completed in ∼2 h.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 479 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 24%
Researcher 89 18%
Student > Master 64 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 6%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 93 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 116 23%
Computer Science 25 5%
Chemistry 20 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 3%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 107 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#2,478
of 2,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,187
of 156,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.