↓ Skip to main content

ppk23-Dependent Chemosensory Functions Contribute to Courtship Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ppk23-Dependent Chemosensory Functions Contribute to Courtship Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
PLoS Genetics, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002587
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Insects utilize diverse families of ion channels to respond to environmental cues and control mating, feeding, and the response to threats. Although degenerin/epithelial sodium channels (DEG/ENaC) represent one of the largest families of ion channels in Drosophila melanogaster, the physiological functions of these proteins are still poorly understood. We found that the DEG/ENaC channel ppk23 is expressed in a subpopulation of sexually dimorphic gustatory-like chemosensory bristles that are distinct from those expressing feeding-related gustatory receptors. Disrupting ppk23 or inhibiting activity of ppk23-expressing neurons did not alter gustatory responses. Instead, blocking ppk23-positive neurons or mutating the ppk23 gene delayed the initiation and reduced the intensity of male courtship. Furthermore, mutations in ppk23 altered the behavioral response of males to the female-specific aphrodisiac pheromone 7(Z), 11(Z)-Heptacosadiene. Together, these data indicate that ppk23 and the cells expressing it play an important role in the peripheral sensory system that determines sexual behavior in Drosophila.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Unknown 155 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 51%
Neuroscience 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,626,496
of 27,359,965 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#7,928
of 9,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,591
of 174,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#120
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,359,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.