↓ Skip to main content

Defining and providing robust controls for microRNA prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defining and providing robust controls for microRNA prediction
Published in
Bioinformatics, March 2012
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts114
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

microRNAs are short non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression by inhibiting target mRNA genes. Next-generation sequencing combined with bioinformatics analyses provide an opportunity to predict numerous novel miRNAs. The efficiency of these predictions relies on the set of positive and negative controls used. We demonstrate that commonly used positive and negative controls may be unreliable and provide a rational methodology with which to replace them.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 54%
Computer Science 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,383,977
of 28,573,925 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#3,520
of 10,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,944
of 176,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#26
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,573,925 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.