↓ Skip to main content

Lung Donation After Controlled Circulatory Determination of Death: A Review of Current Practices and Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Transplantation Proceedings, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lung Donation After Controlled Circulatory Determination of Death: A Review of Current Practices and Outcomes
Published in
Transplantation Proceedings, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Since the first reported series in 1995, transplantation of lungs recovered through donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) has steadily increased. In some European and Australian centers, controlled DCDD accounts for 15% to 30% of all transplanted lungs. Several transplant centers have reported early and midterm outcomes similar to those associated with the use of donors after brain death. Despite these encouraging reports, less than 2% of all lung transplants in the United States are performed using donors after circulatory determination of death. An electronic search from January 1990 to January 2014 was performed to identify series reporting lung transplant outcomes using controlled DCDD. Data from these publications were analyzed in terms of donor characteristics, donation after circulatory determination of death protocols, recipients' characteristics, and early and midterm outcomes. Two hundred twenty-two DCDDs were transplanted into 225 recipients. The rate of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 ranged from 3% to 36%. The need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after transplantation ranged from 0% to 18%. The average intensive care unit stay ranged from 4 to 8.5 days and the average hospital stay ranged from 14 to 35 days. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 0% to 11% and 1-year survival from 88% to 100%. Under clinical protocols developed and strictly applied by several experienced lung transplant programs, lungs from controlled DCDD have produced outcomes very similar to those observed with brain death donors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,265,367
of 27,928,121 outputs
Outputs from Transplantation Proceedings
#643
of 4,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,270
of 280,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplantation Proceedings
#6
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,928,121 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.