↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Budesonide-formoterol reliever therapy versus maintenance budesonide plus terbutaline reliever therapy in adults with mild to moderate asthma (PRACTICAL): a 52-week, open-label, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31948-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo Hardy, Christina Baggott, James Fingleton, Helen K Reddel, Robert J Hancox, Matire Harwood, Andrew Corin, Jenny Sparks, Daniela Hall, Doñah Sabbagh, Saras Mane, Alexandra Vohlidkova, John Martindale, Mathew Williams, Philippa Shirtcliffe, Mark Holliday, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley, PRACTICAL study team, Andrew Corin, Liz Dronfield, Colin Helm, Tracy Paterson, Bhuwan Poudel, Malcolm Dyer, Christine Jasinski, Davitt Sheahan, Pamela Sheahan, Nick Gailer, Jan Van Zuilen, Andy Basa, Christine Devereaux, Karin Egan, Sneha Haughey, Rodney Marks, Dirk Venter, Hank Zhang, Karen Trevithick, Mike Williams, Philippa Williams, Christina Baggott, Richard Beasley, Irene Braithwaite, Alexandra Eathorne, Stefan Ebmeier, James Fingleton, Daniela Hall, Jo Hardy, Matire Harwood, Mark Holliday, Claire Houghton, Saras Mane, John Martindale, Karen Oldfield, Janine Pilcher, Doñah Sabbagh, Philippa Shirtcliffe, Suzanne Snively, Jenny Sparks, Alexandra Vohlidkova, Mathew Williams, Patrick Collins, Summer Hassan, Annika Lam, Claudette Lionnet, Barney Montgomery, Liz Smaill, Stella Moon, Dean Quinn, Elena Bayly-McCredie, Chris Millar-Coote, Dean Millar-Coote, Jim Reid, Anna Samuel, Nicola Burton, Tina Mullard, Tyronne Tranquilino, Edward Watson, Jill Bell, Rachel Harris, John Richmond, Sue Smith, Brent Krivan, Cheryl Robertson, Robert J Hancox, Mark Weatherall, Sue Glensor, Dermot O'Connor, Anne-Christine Porrachia, Helen K Reddel

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 291 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 14%
Other 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Master 20 7%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 109 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 111 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2025.
All research outputs
#303,818
of 34,427,148 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,105
of 51,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,956
of 379,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#47
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,427,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.