To provide recommendations for the comprehensive management of young infants who present with signs or symptoms concerning for laryngomalacia.
Expert opinion by the members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG).
Consensus recommendations include initial care and triage recommendations for health care providers who commonly evaluate young infants with noisy breathing. The consensus statement also provides comprehensive care recommendations for otolaryngologists who manage young infants with laryngomalacia including: evaluation and treatment considerations for commonly debated issues in laryngomalacia, initial work-up of infants presenting with inspiratory stridor, treatment recommendations based on disease severity, management of the infant with feeding difficulties, post-surgical treatment management recommendations, and suggestions for acid suppression therapy.
Laryngomalacia care consensus recommendations are aimed at improving patient-centered care in infants with laryngomalacia.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,800,023
of 29,498,312 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#249
of 3,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,736
of 320,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#6
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,498,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
