↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized, comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury
Published in
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 2014
DOI 10.1177/0269215514556087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 52 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Neuroscience 23 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 58 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,954,210
of 33,036,181 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rehabilitation
#617
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,482
of 299,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rehabilitation
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,036,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.