↓ Skip to main content

Cross Sectional Association between Spatially Measured Walking Bouts and Neighborhood Walkability

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cross Sectional Association between Spatially Measured Walking Bouts and Neighborhood Walkability
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, April 2016
DOI 10.3390/ijerph13040412
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Walking is the most popular choice of aerobic physical activity to improve health among U.S. adults. Physical characteristics of the home neighborhood can facilitate or hinder walking. The purpose of this study was to quantify neighborhood walking, using objective methods and to examine the association between counts of walking bouts in the home neighborhood and neighborhood walkability. This was a cross-sectional study of 106 adults who wore accelerometers and GPS devices for two weeks. Walking was quantified within 1, 2, and 3 km Euclidean (straight-line) and network buffers around the geocoded home location. Walkability was estimated using a commercially available index. Walking bout counts increased with buffer size and were associated with walkability, regardless of buffer type or size (p < 0.001). Quantification of walking bouts within (and outside) of pre-defined neighborhood buffers of different sizes and types allowed for the specification of walking locations to better describe and elucidate walking behaviors. These data support the concept that neighborhood characteristics can influence walking among adults.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,691,880
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#26,907
of 33,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,990
of 317,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#150
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.