You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Günter Blöschl, Julia Hall, Alberto Viglione, Rui A. P. Perdigão, Juraj Parajka, Bruno Merz, David Lun, Berit Arheimer, Giuseppe T. Aronica, Ardian Bilibashi, Miloň Boháč, Ognjen Bonacci, Marco Borga, Ivan Čanjevac, Attilio Castellarin, Giovanni B. Chirico, Pierluigi Claps, Natalia Frolova, Daniele Ganora, Liudmyla Gorbachova, Ali Gül, Jamie Hannaford, Shaun Harrigan, Maria Kireeva, Andrea Kiss, Thomas R. Kjeldsen, Silvia Kohnová, Jarkko J. Koskela, Ondrej Ledvinka, Neil Macdonald, Maria Mavrova-Guirguinova, Luis Mediero, Ralf Merz, Peter Molnar, Alberto Montanari, Conor Murphy, Marzena Osuch, Valeryia Ovcharuk, Ivan Radevski, José L. Salinas, Eric Sauquet, Mojca Šraj, Jan Szolgay, Elena Volpi, Donna Wilson, Klodian Zaimi, Nenad Živković |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 321 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 11% |
| United States | 20 | 6% |
| Germany | 19 | 6% |
| France | 15 | 5% |
| Spain | 12 | 4% |
| Italy | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Finland | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 130 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 221 | 69% |
| Scientists | 88 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 838 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 838 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 18% |
| Researcher | 136 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 119 | 14% |
| Unknown | 258 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 147 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 142 | 17% |
| Engineering | 113 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 69 | 8% |
| Unknown | 319 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 516. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#50,107
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,115
of 98,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#956
of 351,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#110
of 960 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 960 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.