↓ Skip to main content

Underutilization of Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Less Common Cutaneous Malignancies in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Dermatologic Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Underutilization of Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Less Common Cutaneous Malignancies in the United States
Published in
Dermatologic Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/dss.0000000000000705
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Consensus guidelines have defined select less common skin cancers appropriate for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), as these tumors are characterized by asymmetric growth patterns that challenge conventional surgical extirpation of disease. The authors aimed to define surgical patterns of care and to identify factors affecting treatment selection in the United States. Retrospective cohort analysis of nonmetastatic nonmelanoma skin cancers deemed appropriate for MMS by American Academy of Dermatology/American College of Mohs Surgery/American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association/American Society for Mohs Surgery appropriate use criteria from the National Cancer Data Base from 1998 to 2012. Of the included 15,121 patients, 8% received MMS, 30% primary excision, 12% narrow re-excision, and 50% wide re-excision. Utilization of MMS was negatively influenced by community cancer programs, Northeast region, lower education, uninsured status, and administration of radiotherapy. High-risk face areas, lower comorbidity score, and microcystic adnexal carcinoma were associated with higher likelihood of receiving MMS. After adjusting for tumor size, tumor location, and histology, MMS remained an independent predictor of achieving negative surgical margins (odds ratio 3.15, 95% CI 2.27-4.36, and p < .0001). There is considerable variation in surgical treatment patterns by both sociodemographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics. Despite low utilization, patients receiving MMS are more likely to achieve negative surgical margins and less likely to receive radiotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dermatologic Surgery
#1,933
of 3,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,103
of 311,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dermatologic Surgery
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.