↓ Skip to main content

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2000
DOI 10.1001/jama.284.10.1290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
United Kingdom 7 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 580 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 98 16%
Student > Master 78 12%
Other 61 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 8%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Other 199 32%
Unknown 88 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 327 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Psychology 20 3%
Other 81 13%
Unknown 110 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2026.
All research outputs
#677,709
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6,718
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402
of 56,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#8
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.