↓ Skip to main content

Review of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care at Baylor Scott and White Healthcare, Central Region

Overview of attention for article published in Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care at Baylor Scott and White Healthcare, Central Region
Published in
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, December 2017
DOI 10.1080/08998280.2016.11929388
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B Jolly, Norman R Fluet, Michael D Reis, Charles H Stern, Alexander W Thompson, Gillian A Jolly

Abstract

The integration of behavioral health services in primary care has been referred to in many ways, but ultimately refers to common structures and processes. Behavioral health is integrated into primary care because it increases the effectiveness and efficiency of providing care and reduces costs in the care of primary care patients. Reimbursement is one factor, if not the main factor, that determines the level of integration that can be achieved. The federal health reform agenda supports changes that will eventually permit behavioral health to be fully integrated and will allow the health of the population to be the primary target of intervention. In an effort to develop more integrated services at Baylor Scott and White Healthcare, models of integration are reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of each model are discussed. Recommendations to increase integration include adopting a disease management model with care management, planned guideline-based stepped care, follow-up, and treatment monitoring. Population-based interventions can be completed at the pace of the development of alternative reimbursement methods. The program should be based upon patient-centered medical home standards, and research is needed throughout the program development process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Social Sciences 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#24,512,440
of 29,818,267 outputs
Outputs from Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
#1,063
of 1,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,914
of 456,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
#502
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,818,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.