You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Balancing sampling intensity against spatial coverage for a community science monitoring programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13491 |
| Authors |
Emily L. Weiser, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Ralph Grundel, Laura López‐Hoffman, Samuel Pecoraro, Darius Semmens, Wayne E. Thogmartin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Portugal | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,510,342
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,475
of 3,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,005
of 348,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#34
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.