↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Nutritional Factors on Incident Kidney Stone Formation: A Report From the WHI OS

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of Nutritional Factors on Incident Kidney Stone Formation: A Report From the WHI OS
Published in
The Journal of Urology, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.077
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Increased fluid intake, and decreased dietary sodium and animal protein intake are thought to reduce the risk of kidney stones but the role of calcium intake is controversial. We evaluated the relationship between dietary factors and incident kidney stone formation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2026.
All research outputs
#409,542
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#249
of 21,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,602
of 196,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.