↓ Skip to main content

The MICE Muon Beam on ISIS and the beam-line instrumentation of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Instrumentation, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The MICE Muon Beam on ISIS and the beam-line instrumentation of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment
Published in
Journal of Instrumentation, May 2012
DOI 10.1088/1748-0221/7/05/p05009
Authors

M Bogomilov, Y Karadzhov, D Kolev, I Russinov, R Tsenov, G Vankova-Kirilova, L Wang, F Y Xu, S X Zheng, R Bertoni, M Bonesini, F Ferri, G Lucchini, R Mazza, F Paleari, F Strati, V Palladino, G Cecchet, A de Bari, M Capponi, A Cirillo, A Iaciofano, A Manfredini, M Parisi, D Orestano, F Pastore, A Tonazzo, L Tortora, Y Mori, Y Kuno, H Sakamoto, A Sato, T Yano, M Yoshida, S Ishimoto, S Suzuki, K Yoshimura, F Filthaut, R Garoby, S Gilardoni, P Gruber, K Hanke, H Haseroth, P Janot, A Lombardi, S Ramberger, M Vretenar, P Bene, A Blondel, F Cadoux, J -S Graulich, V Grichine, E Gschwendtner, F Masciocchi, R Sandstrom, V Verguilov, H Wisting, C Petitjean, R Seviour, J Alexander, G Charnley, N Collomb, S Griffiths, B Martlew, A Moss, I Mullacrane, A Oates, P Owens, C White, S York, D Adams, R Apsimon, P Barclay, D E Baynham, T W Bradshaw, M Courthold, P Drumm, R Edgecock, T Hayler, M Hills, Y Ivaniouchenkov, A Jones, A Lintern, C MacWaters, C Nelson, A Nichols, R Preece, S Ricciardi, J H Rochford, C Rogers, W Spensley, J Tarrant, K Tilley, S Watson, A Wilson, D Forrest, F J P Soler, K Walaron, P Cooke, R Gamet, A Alekou, M Apollonio, G Barber, R Beuselinck, D Clark, I Clark, D Colling, A Dobbs, P Dornan, S Fayer, A Fish, R Hare, S Greenwood, A Jamdagni, V Kasey, M Khaleeq, J Leaver, K Long, E McKigney, T Matsushita, J Pasternak, T Sashalmi, T Savidge, M Takahashi, V Blackmore, T Carlisle, J H Cobb, W Lau, M Rayner, C D Tunnell, H Witte, S Yang, C N Booth, P Hodgson, L Howlett, R Nicholson, E Overton, M Robinson, P Smith, D Adey, J Back, S Boyd, P Harrison, M Ellis, P Kyberd, M Littlefield, J J Nebrensky, A D Bross, S Geer, D Neuffer, A Moretti, M Popovic, M A C Cummings, T J Roberts, A DeMello, M A Green, D Li, S Virostek, M S Zisman, B Freemire, P Hanlet, D Huang, G Kafka, D M Kaplan, P Snopok, Y Torun, S Blot, Y K Kim, U Bravar, Y Onel, D Cline, Y Fukui, K Lee, X Yang, R A Rimmer, L M Cremaldi, G Gregoire, T L Hart, D A Sanders, D J Summers, L Coney, R Fletcher, G G Hanson, C Heidt, J Gallardo, S Kahn, H Kirk, R B Palmer

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Professor 3 14%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,357,941
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#625
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,682
of 164,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.