You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of the AquaCrop model to simulate the biomass of Miscanthus x giganteus under different nutrient supply conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GCB Bioenergy, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcbb.12206 |
| Authors |
Ruzica Stričević, Zeljko Dželetović, Nevenka Djurović, Marija Cosić |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 15% |
| Engineering | 8 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,155,694
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from GCB Bioenergy
#378
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,489
of 230,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GCB Bioenergy
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.