You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ナミハダニに対する異なる処理時刻における各種ダニ剤の感受性の比較と気門封鎖型農薬による孵化阻害効果
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.4165/kapps.61.61 |
| Authors |
堀川 英則, 伊藤 涼太郎, 小出 哲哉, 大橋 博子, 武山 桂子, 加藤 賢治, 安藤（小島） 寛子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#24
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,272
of 351,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them