You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of sample matrix on the accuracy of nitrite N and O isotope ratio analyses with the azide method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rcm.8569 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Granger, Danielle S. Boshers, John K. Böhlke, Dan Yu, Nengwang Chen, Craig R. Tobias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 26% |
| Professor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,028,437
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#3,430
of 4,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,749
of 456,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#63
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.