↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of a Complete Percutaneous Versus Surgical Approach to Aortic Valve Replacement and Revascularization in Patients at Intermediate Surgical Risk
Published in
Circulation, September 2019
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.118.039564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Søndergaard, Jeffrey J. Popma, Michael J. Reardon, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, G. Michael Deeb, Susheel Kodali, Isaac George, Mathew R. Williams, Steven J. Yakubov, Arie P. Kappetein, Patrick W. Serruys, Eberhard Grube, Molly B. Schiltgen, Yanping Chang, Thomas Engstrøm, Paul Sorajja, Benjamin Sun, Himanshu Agarwal, Thomas Langdon, Peter den Heijer, Mohamed Bentala, Daniel O’Hair, Tanvir Bajwa, Timothy Byrne, Michael Caskey, Basil Paulus, Edward Garrett, Robert Stoler, Robert Hebeler, Kamal Khabbaz, David Scott Lim, Mark Bladergroen, Peter Fail, Edgar Feinberg, Michael Rinaldi, Eric Skipper, Atul Chawla, David Hockmuth, Raj Makkar, Wen Cheng, Janah Aji, Frank Bowen, Theodore Schreiber, Scott Henry, Christian Hengstenberg, Sabine Bleiziffer, J. Kevin Harrison, Chad Hughes, James Joye, Vincent Gaudiani, Vasilis Babaliaros, Vinod Thourani, Harold Dauerman, Joseph Schmoker, Kimberly Skelding, Alfred Casale, Jan Kovac, Tomasz Spyt, Puvi Seshiah, J. Michael Smith, Raymond McKay, Robert Hagberg, Ray Matthews, Vaughn Starnes, William O’Neill, Gaetano Paone, Jose Maria Hernandez García, Miguel Such, Cesar Morís de la Tassa, Juan Carlos Llosa Cortina, Stephan Windecker, Thierry Carrel, Brian Whisenant, John Doty, Jon Resar, John Conte, Vicken Aharonian, Thomas Pfeffer, Andreas Rück, Matthias Corbascio, Daniel Blackman, Pankaj Kaul, Chad Kliger, Derek Brinster, Patrick Teefy, Bob Kiaii, Ferdinand Leya, Mamdouh Bakhos, Gurpreet Sandhu, Alberto Pochettino, Nicolo Piazza, Benoit de Varennes, Ad van Boven, Piet Boonstra, Ron Waksman, Ammar Bafi, Anita Asgar, Raymond Cartier, Robert Kipperman, John Brown, Lang Lin, Joshua Rovin, Samin Sharma, David Adams, Stanley Katz, Alan Hartman, Hasanian Al-Jilaihawi, Juan Crestanello, Scott Lilly, Mohammad Ghani, Robert Mark Bodenhamer, Vivek Rajagopal, James Kauten, Mumbashir Mumtaz, Williams Bachinsky, Georg Nickenig, Armin Welz, Peter Olsen, Daniel Watson, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Keith Allen, Paul Teirstein, Jeffrey Tyner, Paul Mahoney, Joseph Newton, William Merhi, John Keiser, Alan Yeung, Craig Miller, Jurriën ten Berg, Robin Heijmen, George Petrossian, Newell Robinson, Stephen Brecker, Marjan Jahangiri, Thomas Davis, Sanjay Batra, James Hermiller, David Heimansohn, Sam Radhakrishnan, Stephen Fremes, Brijeshwar Maini, Brian Bethea, David Brown, William Ryan, Neal Kleiman, Christian Spies, Jeffrey Lau, Howard Herrmann, Joseph Bavaria, Eric Horlick, Chris Feindel, Franz-Josef Neumann, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Ronald Binder, Francesco Maisano, Marco Costa, Alan Markowitz, Peter Tadros, George Zorn, Eduardo de Marchena, Tomas Salerno, Stanley Chetcuti, Marino Labinz, Marc Ruel, Joon Sup Lee, Thomas Gleason, Frederick Ling, Peter Knight, Mark Robbins, Stephen Ball, John Giacomini, Thomas Burdon, Robert Applegate, Neal Kon, Richard Schwartz, Scott Schubach, John Forrest, Abeel Mangi

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 46 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 45%
Engineering 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 50 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,986,731
of 29,868,835 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#5,157
of 26,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,733
of 356,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#83
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,868,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.