↓ Skip to main content

A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Gardner, Rosemary Davidson, John McAteer, Susan Michie, the "Evidence into Recommendations" study group

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 45 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,056,207
of 26,245,199 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,237
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,239
of 118,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,199 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.