Despite recent advances in the treatment of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) using therapeutic hypothermia, at least 30% of the cooled infants will die or have moderate/severe neurological disability. Umbilical cord blood cells (UCBCs), which are readily available at birth, have been shown to reduce sensorimotor and/or cognitive impairments in several models of brain damage, representing a promising option for the treatment of neurological diseases. In this review, we discuss recent preclinical studies that assessed the effects of UCBC transplantation in the Rice-Vannucci animal model of HIE. We also review the possible cell types and mechanisms involved in the therapeutic effect of UCBC transplantation, including neuroprotection, immunomodulation, and stimulation of neural plasticity and regeneration. In addition, we discuss how neuroimaging methods, such as bioluminescence imaging, nuclear-medicine imaging, or magnetic resonance imaging, could be used to evaluate the biodistribution of UCBCs in both preclinical and clinical studies.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
1%
Other
7
9%
Unknown
18
23%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,143,536
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#3,302
of 5,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,380
of 247,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
