↓ Skip to main content

Red China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development under the Commune. By Joshua Eisenman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018. xxxii, 436 pp.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian Studies, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development under the Commune. By Joshua Eisenman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018. xxxii, 436 pp. ISBN: 9780231186674 (paper).
Published in
Journal of Asian Studies, August 2019
DOI 10.1017/s002191181900072x
Authors

Li Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,268,667
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Studies
#267
of 1,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,746
of 338,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Studies
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.