↓ Skip to main content

Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk Reduction in Jewish BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk Reduction in Jewish BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2012
DOI 10.1200/jco.2011.37.8133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian S. Finkelman, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Sue Friedman, Tara M. Friebel, Shera Dubitsky, Niecee Singer Schonberger, Rochelle Shoretz, Christian F. Singer, Joanne L. Blum, Nadine Tung, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Carrie Snyder, Judy E. Garber, Joellen Schildkraut, Mary B. Daly, Claudine Isaacs, Gabrielle Pichert, Susan L. Neuhausen, Fergus J. Couch, Laura van't Veer, Rosalind Eeles, Elizabeth Bancroft, D. Gareth Evans, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail E. Tomlinson, Steven A. Narod, Ellen Matloff, Susan Domchek, Timothy R. Rebbeck

Abstract

Mutations in BRCA1/2 dramatically increase the risk of both breast and ovarian cancers. Three mutations in these genes (185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT) occur at high frequency in Ashkenazi Jews. We evaluated how these common Jewish mutations (CJMs) affect cancer risks and risk reduction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 11 15%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,176,324
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6,978
of 22,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,377
of 170,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#68
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.