Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change on repeated diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during radiochemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A pilot study
Serial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) during radiochemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is analyzed to investigate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a potential biomarker for tumor response.
Ten patients underwent DW-MRI prior to and at three and six weeks during radiochemotherapy. Three methods of contouring primary tumors (PT) were performed to evaluate the impact of tumor heterogeneity on ADC values: PTT: whole tumor volume; PTT-N: PTT-necrosis; PTL: small volume of presumed active tumor with low ADC value. Pretreatment and during-treatment absolute ADC values and ADC value changes were analyzed for PT and involved lymph nodes (LN).
ADC values for PTT, PTT-N, PTL and LN increased by 8-14% (PT) and 15% (LN) at three weeks, and 19-26% and 23% at 6 weeks post initial treatment (p=0.04-0.002). Average percent ADC value increase was smaller than tumor volume regression (p=0.06-0.0005). Patients with overall survival <12 months had a lower increase of ADC values compared to longer surviving patients (p=0.008 for PTT).
Significant ADC value increases during radiochemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer were observed. ADC value change during treatment appears to be an independent marker of patient outcome and warrants further investigation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#23,387,584
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#3,169
of 4,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,900
of 339,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
