↓ Skip to main content

Environmental temperatures shape thermal physiology as well as diversification and genome-wide substitution rates in lizards

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
110 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental temperatures shape thermal physiology as well as diversification and genome-wide substitution rates in lizards
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11943-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Garcia-Porta, Iker Irisarri, Martin Kirchner, Ariel Rodríguez, Sebastian Kirchhof, Jason L. Brown, Amy MacLeod, Alexander P. Turner, Faraham Ahmadzadeh, Gonzalo Albaladejo, Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailovic, Ignacio De la Riva, Adnane Fawzi, Pedro Galán, Bayram Göçmen, D. James Harris, Octavio Jiménez-Robles, Ulrich Joger, Olga Jovanović Glavaš, Mert Karış, Giannina Koziel, Sven Künzel, Mariana Lyra, Donald Miles, Manuel Nogales, Mehmet Anıl Oğuz, Panayiotis Pafilis, Loïs Rancilhac, Noemí Rodríguez, Benza Rodríguez Concepción, Eugenia Sanchez, Daniele Salvi, Tahar Slimani, Abderrahim S’khifa, Ali Turk Qashqaei, Anamarija Žagar, Alan Lemmon, Emily Moriarty Lemmon, Miguel Angel Carretero, Salvador Carranza, Hervé Philippe, Barry Sinervo, Johannes Müller, Miguel Vences, Katharina C. Wollenberg Valero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 42%
Environmental Science 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#313,434
of 26,060,592 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,723
of 59,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,164
of 354,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#98
of 1,474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,060,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.