↓ Skip to main content

Surveillance for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus in Wild Birds during Outbreaks in Domestic Poultry, Minnesota, 2015 - Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal …

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surveillance for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus in Wild Birds during Outbreaks in Domestic Poultry, Minnesota, 2015 - Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, July 2016
DOI 10.3201/eid2207.152032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher S Jennelle, Michelle Carstensen, Erik C Hildebrand, Louis Cornicelli, Paul Wolf, Daniel A Grear, Hon S Ip, Kaci K Vandalen, Larissa A Minicucci

Abstract

In 2015, a major outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) infection devastated poultry facilities in Minnesota, USA. To clarify the role of wild birds, we tested 3,139 waterfowl fecal samples and 104 sick and dead birds during March 9-June 4, 2015. HPAIV was isolated from a Cooper's hawk but not from waterfowl.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,655,588
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#2,718
of 9,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,024
of 372,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#48
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.