↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of concepts in forest pathology.

Overview of attention for article published in Phytopathology, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evolution of concepts in forest pathology.
Published in
Phytopathology, August 2003
DOI 10.1094/phyto.2003.93.8.1052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 34%
Environmental Science 17 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,598,490
of 31,836,582 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology
#1,019
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,817
of 70,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,836,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.