You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling strategies and evaluating success during repatriations of elusive and endangered species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acv.12537 |
| Authors |
B. Folt, C. P. McGowan, D. A. Steen, S. Piccolomini, M. Hoffman, J. C. Godwin, C. Guyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 46% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Scientists | 10 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 34% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,645,161
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#258
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,082
of 351,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.