↓ Skip to main content

川中 豪編著 『後退する民主主義、強化される権威主義―最良の政治制度とは何か』

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
川中 豪編著 『後退する民主主義、強化される権威主義―最良の政治制度とは何か』
Published in
Asian Studies, July 2019
DOI 10.11479/asianstudies.65.3_41
Authors

長谷川 雄之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies
#76
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,805
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.