↓ Skip to main content

The Human Vaccines Project: A roadmap for cancer vaccine development

Overview of attention for article published in Science Translational Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Human Vaccines Project: A roadmap for cancer vaccine development
Published in
Science Translational Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf0685
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cancer vaccine development has been vigorously pursued for 40 years. Immunity to tumor antigens can be elicited by most vaccines tested, but their clinical efficacy remains modest. We argue that a concerted international effort is necessary to understand the human antitumor immune response and achieve clinically effective cancer vaccines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 284 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Other 21 7%
Student > Master 21 7%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 50 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Engineering 11 4%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 78 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,018,804
of 33,143,744 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#2,166
of 5,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,649
of 332,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#34
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,143,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 91.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.