You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
九頭竜川におけるアラレガコ(カマキリ)の保全・再生に向けて
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Civil Engineering, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3825/ece.22.1 |
| Authors |
Daisuke TAHARA, Haruo AOKI, Keigo NAKAMURA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,098,156
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#66
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,870
of 360,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.