↓ Skip to main content

Young People Learning to Live With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Health Research, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Young People Learning to Live With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Qualitative Health Research, April 2011
DOI 10.1177/1049732311407211
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In a longitudinal study we investigated how young people come to live with a chronic disease, and asked them to record an audio diary on a regular basis. We also interviewed each participant every 6 weeks. Our analysis focused within and across the diary sets of 6 young people diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. All were aged between 11 and 16 years, and their recordings provided an insight into the experience of living within and beyond disease, and of negotiating health in the context of adolescence. This data collection method, which became known as the unclosed diary, was well received by the young people, who made use of their diaries in different ways. Three key aspects of their diary use, immediacy and intimacy, conversation, and reflection, demonstrate the flexibility of the method both as a means of accessing young people's lives at a time of change and development, and as a personal resource for the participants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#19,475,346
of 29,895,294 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Health Research
#1,442
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,911
of 134,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Health Research
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,895,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.