↓ Skip to main content

A risk-minimizing argument for traditional crop varietal diversity use to reduce pest and disease damage in agricultural ecosystems of Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A risk-minimizing argument for traditional crop varietal diversity use to reduce pest and disease damage in agricultural ecosystems of Uganda
Published in
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, August 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.02.012
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 223 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 25%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Other 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 46 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 41%
Environmental Science 33 13%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Computer Science 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 61 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,034,217
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
#334
of 4,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,717
of 213,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.