↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian inference analyses of the polygenic architecture of rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
467 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bayesian inference analyses of the polygenic architecture of rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Nature Genetics, March 2012
DOI 10.1038/ng.2232
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The genetic architectures of common, complex diseases are largely uncharacterized. We modeled the genetic architecture underlying genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for rheumatoid arthritis and developed a new method using polygenic risk-score analyses to infer the total liability-scale variance explained by associated GWAS SNPs. Using this method, we estimated that, together, thousands of SNPs from rheumatoid arthritis GWAS explain an additional 20% of disease risk (excluding known associated loci). We further tested this method on datasets for three additional diseases and obtained comparable estimates for celiac disease (43% excluding the major histocompatibility complex), myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease (48%) and type 2 diabetes (49%). Our results are consistent with simulated genetic models in which hundreds of associated loci harbor common causal variants and a smaller number of loci harbor multiple rare causal variants. These analyses suggest that GWAS will continue to be highly productive for the discovery of additional susceptibility loci for common diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 22 5%
Netherlands 6 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 418 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 130 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 25%
Student > Master 39 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 6%
Professor 25 5%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 48 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 16%
Computer Science 24 5%
Mathematics 13 3%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 62 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,630,395
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,226
of 8,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,535
of 208,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#40
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.