You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The susceptibility of Oklahoma’s basement to seismic reactivation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41561-019-0440-5 |
| Authors |
F. Kolawole, C. S. Johnston, C. B. Morgan, J. C. Chang, K. J. Marfurt, D. A. Lockner, Z. Reches, B. M. Carpenter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 21% |
| Nigeria | 14 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 2 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 68% |
| Scientists | 33 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 57% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Energy | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#534,587
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,005
of 3,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,836
of 339,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.