↓ Skip to main content

Nationally poor, locally rich: Income and local context in the 2016 presidential election

Overview of attention for article published in Electoral Studies, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 1,439)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
144 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nationally poor, locally rich: Income and local context in the 2016 presidential election
Published in
Electoral Studies, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102068
Authors

Thomas Ogorzalek, Spencer Piston, Luisa Godinez Puig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 47%
Unspecified 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#375,847
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#39
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,112
of 434,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.