↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA degradation and turnover: regulating the regulators

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MicroRNA degradation and turnover: regulating the regulators
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/wrna.1114
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous, small noncoding RNAs that play important regulatory roles in gene expression. The control of miRNA biogenesis has been well characterized, but their degradation is not fully understood. Recent discoveries indicate that miRNAs have a long life span in general. However, rapid turnover dynamics of miRNAs in a variety of specific cellular contexts has been documented, as well as the requirement of sequence elements for miRNA decay. Furthermore, several ribonucleases that degrade miRNAs have been identified. Here, we discuss the cellular contexts and biochemical mechanisms of miRNA decay, together with several prominent questions in this field.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 27%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#22,206,907
of 31,959,560 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA
#483
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,592
of 197,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,959,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.